Introduction
Oblique restorations (even when they’re costlier and time-consuming in contrast with direct restorations) present diminished polymerization shrinkage;1 higher esthetic, bodily, and mechanical properties by post-curing the restoration with gentle/warmth; very best occlusal morphology; interproximal contacts and put on compatibility with opposing enamel.1,2 Oblique restorations can even assist the restoration of deep preparations with gingival margins positioned in dentin.3
Restorative dentistry is against the wastage of tooth tissue. Therefore, minimally invasive restorations resembling inlays, onlays, and laminate veneers are employed. Nonetheless, whatever the quantity of tooth substance eliminated, publicity of dentin tubules is inevitable.4 Given the insufficient sealing supplied by interim cementation supplies, uncovered dentin is confronted with bacterial microleakage, in addition to chemical and mechanical stimuli transmitted throughout impression-taking, rinsing, drying, perform, and elimination of provisional supplies.5
To counterbalance the above-mentioned points and stop potential pulp harm, the quick utility of a dentin-bonding agent (DBA) after tooth preparation and earlier than impression-taking was launched within the early-Nineteen Nineties by Pashley et al.6 This methodology, which can also be known as “prehybridization”, “twin bonding approach”, and “resin coating approach”, was established with the time period “quick dentin sealing” (IDS).7 In typical procedures, sealing of the dentin tubules takes place on the bonding stage of the ultimate restoration (delayed dentin sealing [DDS]).8 Thus, throughout provisionalization, uncovered dentin leaves a possible pathway for bacterial infiltration. Conversely, within the IDS approach, dentin adhesives are utilized earlier than the provisional section, which presents advantages with regard to bacterial microleakage, dentin hypersensitivity, hole formation, and bond power.9
As a result of articles elaborating all features relating to IDS and offering a unanimous protocol are missing,10 on this examine we reviewed the literature and clarified sure scientific procedures associated to every step of IDS utility.
Supplies and Strategies
We looked for evidence-based analysis articles on IDS revealed from January 1990 till December 2020 utilizing MEDLINE, Cochrane, Ovid and Scopus databases. After preliminary screening of the literature, the phrases “quick dentin sealing”, “twin bonding approach”, “resin coating approach”, and “prehybridization” had been used as key phrases. Supplementary handbook analysis was additionally performed.
Peer-reviewed articles, articles written in English, and articles relating to the IDS approach in human, everlasting enamel had been the inclusion standards. Articles not written in English, duplicates, and articles not specializing in features of the IDS approach or in vitro research together with main or bovine enamel had been excluded from additional analysis.
The search recognized 26.222 articles. After a gradual screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, all articles had been evaluated independently by two reviewers (T.S. and D.P.) for his or her appropriateness. Discrepancies between the 2 reviewers had been mentioned till consensus was reached.
Outcomes
After exclusion of irrelevant or duplicated articles, 88 articles had been included on this assessment. Info relating to the kind of examine, examine design, and predominant findings are depicted in Table 1. For higher understanding and segmentation of the obtainable literature, we divided the articles and introduced the data in accordance with the chronological steps of the approach and corresponding scientific appointments (Figure 1).
 |
Determine 1 Questions relating to every scientific step of the restorative protocol containing the IDS approach and willpower of the sections mentioned on this assessment. Abbreviations: IDS, quick dentin sealing; DDS, delayed dentin sealing. |
Every part of this manuscript solutions an important query relating to the therapy method in addition to the technical particulars of IDS utility. First, the rationale supporting choice of the approach is analyzed. Furthermore, we cite all obtainable proof for probably the most acceptable adhesive programs; interplay with impression supplies; provisional restorations; floor conditioning; materials choice for adhesive luting and movie thickness; restorative supplies; microleakage/marginal adaptation; time of restoration placement; and hypersensitivity.
IDS Protocol
The IDS approach rests upon 4 basic rules.11 First, solely fresh-cut, contaminant-free dentin gives the optimum substrate for bonding. In every other case, the bond power is inferior.12,13 Second, if the DBA and overlaying composite are light-cured collectively, the hybrid layer could collapse because of the stress from the composite or restoration placement.14–16 Thus, precuring the DBA ends in a greater bond power. Third, IDS and delayed restoration placement allow maturation of the dentin bond in an atmosphere freed from occlusal forces and overlaying composite shrinkage.71,72 Fourth, IDS reduces fluid and bacterial penetration.
The scientific benefits rising from the aforementioned embrace11 (i) affected person consolation throughout provisionalization, much less want for anesthesia on the cementation appointment, and diminished post-cementation sensitivity; (ii) elevated bond power and retention, particularly for tapered enamel with quick scientific crowns and minimal elimination of tooth tissue;17 (iii) impartial therapy and conditioning of dentin and enamel that maximizes the general efficiency of each tissues in line with their particular person traits.
In response to Magne,9,18 step one of IDS is to differentiate dentin from enamel. For this function, a preliminary etching of two–3 s is undertaken on the complete tooth floor. After thorough rinsing, enamel acquires a “frosty” look, whereas dentin is extra “shiny”. Then, utilizing a diamond bur (in etch-and-rinse programs) or a carbide tungsten bur (in self-etch programs), a contemporary layer of dentin is uncovered, over which a thick layer of a DBA is utilized and light-polymerized in line with producer directions. Within the case of unfilled adhesive, a supplementary layer of flowable resin is really useful or alternatively, a daily composite to appropriate geometry, get rid of undercuts, or elevate the preparation. After that, the DBA is polymerized moreover via glycerin gel (air-blocking) to scale back the oxygen-inhibition layer (OIL) and rinsed with air/water spray. To take away extra adhesive, enamel margins could must be corrected with a diamond bur.
Earlier than the impression process with elastomeric supplies, the tooth preparation is pumiced softly with a rubber cup for OIL discount and, after that it’s remoted with a separating medium (eg, petroleum jelly) to keep away from locking of the interim restoration. With regard to placement of the ultimate restoration, the sealed floor should be air-abraded and the enamel etched with phosphoric acid (H3PO4). Lastly, the restoration is luted with a resin-based cement. Nonetheless, supplies and protocols are evolving consistently, so the above-mentioned pointers could deviate. The important thing aspect is to observe the fundamental steps and combine the brand new supplies concurrently following producer directions.
Sort of Adhesive System
In adhesive dentistry, there are at all times makes an attempt to simplify bonding steps to scale back “chair time” and make scientific procedures much less technique-sensitive. Nonetheless, a standard three-step total-etch DBA claimed to be probably the most dependable long-term choice is really useful by Magne9 for IDS. Students have reported19,20 that older three-step etch-and-rinse programs and two-step self-etch programs are superior to single-step programs with regard to sturdiness, getting old, and bond power. Moreover, older adhesives type a extra hydrophobic resin coating, which is fascinating for IDS efficacy.19 Single-step self-etching adhesives have been accused of being prone to degradation if water saved due to the elevated hydrophilicity of their interface.21 It has additionally been advised that, for very important enamel with optimistic pulpal stress, the penetration of dentinal fluid via polymerized adhesive layers could deteriorate airtight dentin sealing if simplified adhesive programs are employed.5
Duarte et al3 revealed that each total-etch adhesives and self-etch adhesives favored IDS attaining a considerably larger bond power than that utilizing the standard method (with out IDS). Conversely, Ferreira-Filho et al,21 in an try to analyze the conduct of 4 adhesive programs (one-step self-etch Xeno V; two-step self-etch Clearfil SE Bond; two-step etch-and-rinse XP Bond; three-step etch-and-rinse Optibond FL), discovered no variations in microtensile bond power among the many adhesives examined and the management group (with out IDS) after 3 months of water storage.
It’s clear that the adhesive system utilized influences the permeability of sealed dentin, to not point out that there are adhesives reported to be much less efficient than the unique smear layer.22–24 Sahin et al5 tried to determine the hydraulic conductance of dentin after utility of 5 supplies (two-step self-etch Clearfil Shield Bond; all-in-one self-etch adhesive Adper Immediate L-Pop; one-component self-etch adhesives Clearfil S3 Bond and G-Bond; etch-and-rinse adhesive Single Bond 2; one dentin desensitizer Gluma). They reported that not one of the adhesives examined achieved airtight dentin sealing. Nonetheless, G-Bond and Clearfil Shield Bond managed extra efficacious sealing than the unique smear layer. The outcomes of that examine are in settlement with information from one other examine23 demonstrating that Clearfil Shield Bond had the bottom fluid permeability, adopted by G-Bond (which manifested decrease however statistically related permeability with that utilizing Clearfil S3 Bond).
Though a number of research have in contrast the efficacy of various DBAs used for IDS, typical programs (three-step-total-etch, two-step-self-etch) are really useful as a result of their scientific efficacy has been substantiated by many research in current a long time. Adherence to producer directions is of the utmost significance.
Interplay with Impression Supplies
A number of points come up relating to the contamination of a resin coating floor by elastomeric impression supplies. If light-cured, DBAs current a superficial OIL.25 The thickness of the OIL is ~40 μm and may inhibit the polymerization of elastomeric impression supplies.25,26 Magne and Nielsen27 demonstrated a considerable layer of unpolymerized resin in specimens wherein IDS had been utilized with out additional floor therapy, no matter the kind of DBA or impression materials used. This, in flip, led to faulty impressions. These findings are in settlement with information from Ghiggi et al,28 who noticed numerous interplay sorts amongst resin supplies and impression supplies: silicone confirmed incomplete polymerization and polyether, though polymerized, tried to stick to the resin current on the floor. It’s speculated that the chemical composition of vinylpolysiloxane and polyethers accounts for his or her totally different interactions with resin supplies.28 Particularly, for vinyl polysiloxane, the monomers current within the OIL could react with the platinum salt (the catalyst within the polymerization response). Consequently, a small portion of the sunshine impression materials stays unpolymerized over the resin supplies. For polyethers, the initiator agent is cation that may react with the free radicals of monomers from the floor of resin supplies (ionic polymerization). Moreover, the hydrophilicity of polyethers, their larger stiffness, and their decrease resistance to tear as compared with these of vinyl polysiloxane favors superficial adhesion to the resin floor, and so faulty impressions emerge. The hydrophilic monomer hydroxyethylmethacrylate, which is current within the adhesive resin of some DBAs, has been additionally accused of inflicting residual inhibition.27
Primarily based on the data that lowering/eliminating the OIL would result in the abovementioned points being resolved, a number of cleansing protocols after IDS utility and earlier than impression-taking have been advised. Magne and Nielsen27 advocated that the residues of impression supplies might be diminished with further polymerization of the DBA with glycerin jelly (air-blocking) and pumicing (light utility of a pumice water combine with a tender rubber prophy cup and slow-speed handpiece at 500 rpm), however solely with silicone impression supplies. A polyether was not really useful with IDS due to the excessive incidence of defective impressions (unpolymerized impression materials, adhesion, tearing). These findings are in settlement with an in vitro examine by Khakiani et al.29
Bruzi et al30 advised that masking the IDS layer with a liner (flowable/composite) resolves the difficulty of interplay with impression supplies. Coating the DBA with flowable resin enhances subsequent polymerization of the OIL in uncured adhesives due to the diffusion of free radicals from the flowable resin.31,32
Ghiggi et al28 in contrast the air-blocking approach with the usage of a cotton pellet soaked in alcohol. They concluded that each strategies had been equally environment friendly in stopping interplay with impression supplies.
Sinjari et al,33 in an try and determine a secure protocol for scientific surfaces, evaluated the applying of prophy paste therapy (floor rigorously cleaned with a handpiece, coping brush, and prophy paste at 500 rpm beneath a water spray for 15 s) and of a surfactant agent (Marseille cleaning soap) on the IDS floor earlier than impression-taking with silicone and polyether. The researchers demonstrated a discount of residues in prophy teams and their whole disappearance in prophy + Marseille-soap teams for the 2 impression supplies examined.
Provided that OIL elimination is the important thing issue for a defect-free impression, researchers have targeted consideration on double polymerization of the DBA with glycerin gel and the a number of cleansing protocols advised in literature. Even when polyether as an impression materials is disapproved by most authors, the protocol of Sinjari et al (prophy paste + Marseille cleaning soap) provides cautious optimism relating to the selection of impression materials.
Interplay with Provisional Supplies
With regard to the selection of interim materials and cement, resin-based ones must be prevented.9,34 Direct acrylic-based provisional supplies can’t seal preparations hermetically, which leads to contamination of the IDS floor and lack of retention.35 Conversely, no matter OIL elimination, direct bis-acryl-based provisional supplies and resin-based interim cements bond strongly to the IDS substrate.35 Therefore, elimination of the provisional materials proves to be demanding and typically it should be cut-off the tooth, which jeopardizes the integrity of tooth preparation.35 Even after persistent mechanical cleansing and conditioning with 37% phosphoric acid, the presence of interim-material residue on dentin has been recognized in research utilizing scanning electron microscopy36,37 and atomic pressure microscopy.38 That is the explanation why Magne9 strongly recommends isolation of the tooth preparation with a thick layer of a separating medium (petroleum jelly) throughout fabrication of the provisional materials.
The presence of interim-material residues after cleansing has been documented. The query is whether or not the remaining residues have an effect on the bond power to such an extent that makes bonding inadequate.39 Some authors have reported a discount within the bond power of resin supplies solely after use of eugenol-containing cements,40,41 whereas different students haven’t discriminated the kind of interim cement.42 To counteract the drawbacks of eugenol (interplay with initiators, lack of retention, microleakage43), one may suggest its alternative by carboxylic acids. However, a substantial discount in bond power after adhesive cementation has additionally been noticed with non-eugenol formulations.13 It has been demonstrated that if IDS is utilized, no matter the usage of eugenol-containing or eugenol-free provisional luting brokers,43 interim supplies don’t affect the adhesion high quality of resin cements.39,43–46
Schoenbaum et al35 advised the “reverse spot bonding approach” for provisional cementation. This system depends on the bonding of the provisional materials in solely a small space of the IDS-prepared tooth, away from the margins. This serves environment friendly cleansing of the floor on the cementation appointment. A small portion of fast-setting condensation silicone is positioned in the midst of the preparation, masking 2–3 mm of the sealed floor. Then, a separating medium is utilized on the complete floor of the preparation. The silicone increment is eliminated to depart a small lively bonding space whereas the remaining portion of the sealed floor doesn’t bond to the bis-acryl materials due to the presence of the separating movie.
Interim restoration ought to defend the underlying tooth floor and never endanger the integrity of the preparation after its elimination. Utility of a separating medium mixed with spot bonding appears to serve the above-mentioned necessities. Furthermore, resin-based non permanent cements must be prevented,47 except isolation utilizing a water-soluble gel has been utilized beforehand.34
Conditioning Strategies
A contaminant-free substrate is a necessity for optimum bonding. Due to this fact, choice of the suitable conditioning methodology is of utmost significance. Magne et al9 employed air-borne particle abrasion (APA) with aluminum oxide, whereas Dillenburg et al48 demonstrated that further etching with phosphoric acid had a optimistic impression on conditioning sealed dentin. In one other examine,49 sprucing with fluoride-free pumice paste and APA with silicoated aluminum oxide or glycin proved to be equally environment friendly strategies, whereas APA with calcium carbonate was contraindicated resulting from its larger roughness together with the decrease bond power following its utility. van den Breemer et al50,51 noticed that neither cleansing with pumice nor pumicing with a further tribochemical silica coating affected the bond power. Though they might not determine the optimum mixture of IDS/conditioning methodology, they advised a thick IDS layer conditioned with silica coating. Silica coating expands the adhesive floor space by way of deposition of silica particles. This motion permits superior mechanical retention52 and cleans the floor, thereby enabling chemical co-polymerization of the resin-based cement with IDS.50 With regard to sandblasting with alumina, lack of filling particles is probably going49 as is a discount of the resin-to-resin bond power.51,53 Though as outlined above there are conflicting outcomes, opposite to pumicing with a rotary brush, entry to troublesome components of the preparation achieved by sandblasting is fascinating.
There may be an array of conditioning strategies/supplies, and additional investigation on their potential affect on the IDS floor is required. Nonetheless, plainly strategies guaranteeing bodily elimination of some micrometers (resembling APA) from the resin floor which is involved with oral fluids must be carried out54 at restricted utility length because it enhances diffusion of resin cements.55 After cleaning, dentin floor must be reactivated by adhesive resin.55
Movie Thickness
The chance of re-exposure of dentin after conditioning is substantive, and relies not solely on the conditioning methodology but additionally on the thickness of the IDS movie.56 Movie thickness relies on the product and its location on the tooth (larger in concave areas than in convex areas).56 The upper movie thickness in concave areas is attributed to the tendency of the adhesive to “pool” on the inside angles of the preparation. Low thickness within the border of the preparation is fascinating as a result of a excessive one would expose the adhesive to the oral cavity, with subsequent degradation.57
Stavridakis et al56 advised the usage of a stuffed DBA to stop dentin re-exposure after conditioning. Hashimoto et al58 noticed a rise within the bond power after utility of a number of layers of adhesive (≤4 layers), whereas Ito et al59 concluded that the separate polymerization of every layer improved the standard of dentin adhesion. The IDS layer has been discovered to have an effect on cement thickness.60 A thicker IDS movie contributes to higher distribution of stress, yields a superior bond power, and gives extra steady bonding,50,60,61 whereas elimination of undercuts turns into simpler.51 Nonetheless, if making use of a multi-layering approach, one ought to take note of the “very best” thickness of the adhesive system used and observe producer directions carefully.62
A supplementary layer of a low-viscosity resin (LVR) over the DBA is really useful,57 particularly if unfilled DBAs are used.11 Free radicals from the LVR work together with the uncured resin or the acidic monomers from the OIL63 to enhance the polymerization of the adhesive system.31 Furthermore, an LVR reduces the permeability of adhesives and improves coupling with the resin cement.64 Even when resin–dentin interfaces degrade over time, an LVR protects the underlying hybrid layer and preserves the integrity of the dentin seal.65 An LVR can act as an “absorbing cushion” of the contraction stress generated throughout resin cement polymerization and, thus, modify the failure sample63,66 (the formation of a resistant hybridization course of contributes to the preservation of the bonded interface space if a fracture happens). Therefore, an improved bond power has been recorded when including an LVR31,67,68 though plainly choice of the LVR kind can have an effect on the efficiency of the restoration.69 Usually, the usage of supplies with excessive final power for cementation and coating is really useful.32 Within the case of discolored dentin, utility of an opaque resin over the DBA reduces the bond power probably because of the restricted mechanical properties of the liner.70 If masking is required, use of a separate layer of opaque resin is most well-liked to mixing with the DBA.70
A thick IDS layer is essential to stop dentin re-exposure after conditioning. Addition of an LVR gives an array of benefits and so its utility is crucial within the case of unfilled DBAs.
Interplay with Luting Cements
IDS manifests the very best retentive stress if mixed with resin cements. Thus, IDS is indicated in instances of a brief scientific crown peak and excessive angle of convergence. IDS gives environment friendly retention with glass ionomer cements as effectively, however not at all ought to or not it’s used with zinc phosphate.71,72 Dalby et al73 discovered that IDS didn’t have an effect on the bond power of the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem. In an analogous examine74 that examined a number of self-adhesive resin cements, IDS was discovered to affect the bond power of the resin cement relying on its kind (bond-strength values of Panavia F2.0, RelyX Unicem and RelyX Unicem2 had been improved, however no results had been reported for Clearfil SA Cement and G-Cem). It has been additionally demonstrated that even when simulated pulpal stress negatively impacts the standard of resin–dentin interfaces, IDS will increase the bond power of self-adhesive and standard resin cements.75 IDS additionally interacts effectively if luted with typical light-cured composites, as indicated by the wonderful medium-term prognosis of partial ceramic restorations in a current scientific examine.76
IDS has been demonstrated to enhance the bond power of resin cements (typical or self-adhesive). Typical resin cements are really useful within the literature for his or her superior properties with regard to bond power, bond-degradation conduct, susceptibility to aqueous getting old, and water absorption.
Interplay with Preparation Design
The survival charge of minimally invasive restorations is influenced by the preparation design, restoration thickness and geometry, restorative materials, occlusal loading, and bonding procedures.77 A number of research77–82 investigating several types of restorations and restorative supplies have proven that IDS enhances the bond power, fracture resistance, and bond reliability of the restorations examined. With regard to endocrowns, El-Damanhoury and Gaintantzopoulou83 confirmed that IDS doesn’t enhance their fracture resistance. Nonetheless, a scientific examine demonstrated the excessive success charge of endocrowns by way of debonding when IDS is utilized.84 The survival charge of laminate veneers decreases if bonded to dentin.85 Within the case of restricted dentin publicity (lower than one-quarter of the bonding floor), IDS has no affect on them.86 Nonetheless, with >50% of dentin publicity, laminate veneers profit considerably from IDS.87 In a current examine, Hofsteenge et al88 investigated the affect of IDS on the fracture power of various preparation designs (inlays–overlays). Although IDS along side an overlay preparation resulted within the highest fracture power, the authors concluded that the IDS utility didn’t work together with the impact of the preparation design on fracture power.
Time of Restoration Placement
With IDS, there’s leeway within the dentin bond to develop in a stress-free atmosphere and, thus, to be optimum.11 Magne19 advocates that IDS favors delayed restoration placement for ≤12 weeks. Leesungbok et al89 investigated the affect of IDS on the dentin bond power of a lithium-disilicate ceramic beneath varied thermocycling durations (1, 2, 7 and 14 days). They recognized a discount in bond power after 1 week and a larger one (characterised by a bigger space of indifferent cement and uncovered dentin) after 2 weeks. Thus, the authors strongly advocate the ultimate bonding to be inside 1 week after IDS utility.
The IDS idea counts on the success of the bond between the resin coating and luting agent, which has similarities to the one for resin-to-resin restore.19 Placement of a provisional restoration for ≤2 weeks doesn’t endanger the resin-to-resin bond, and van den Waals interactions, and micro-mechanical interlocking can account for it.9,90,91 Nonetheless, to realize this, the prevailing adhesive layer should be conditioned.9 Even whether it is claimed {that a} delayed restoration placement is attainable when IDS is utilized, the ultimate restoration must be delivered as quickly as potential.
Microleakage/Adaptation of the Remaining Restoration
The adhesive layer–dentin interface constitutes probably the most weak a part of the bonded restoration, so micro-leakage stays a serious concern if a restoration is thermally and occlusally pressured.3 There’s a huge variation regarding acceptable values for marginal discrepancy: they vary from 20–40 μm to 160 μm.92–94 Duarte et al3 demonstrated that even when IDS favored bond power, micro-leakage was not improved. Conversely, a number of research have proven that if the DBA is mixed with an LVR, a smaller hole formation within the dentin–restoration interface is noticed,31,95–99 even when subjected to loading.95,100 A variant of IDS undertaken within the entry cavity of enamel subjected to endodontic therapy (quick endodontic sealing) has been proven to scale back coronal leakage, which is the main explanation for failure.101 In a current examine, Ashy et al8 recognized a greater marginal adaptation instantly after cementation and a greater inner adaptation after thermocycling, when IDS was utilized, in contrast with that utilizing the standard methodology (DDS). Nonetheless, there was no vital distinction in marginal adaptation after thermocycling among the many two methods examined. Due to this fact, IDS appears to scale back microleakage, whereas a DBA mixed with an LVR gives extra predictable outcomes.
Hypersensitivity
Throughout the provisional section and after cementation of the ultimate restoration, it is not uncommon for the affected person to expertise an disagreeable symptom characterised by a brief, sharp ache upon thermal and chemical stimuli.102 A number of components can account for this impact: over-heating and dehydration throughout preparation, bacterial micro-leakage, or fluid motion via dentin tubules.21 Though dentin hypersensitivity often resolves inside 24 months,102 its persistence can overwhelm the affected person and put the clinician’s popularity in danger. Hu and Zhu103 undertook a sensitivity evaluation 1 week in addition to 1, 6, 12 and 24 months after cementation of a three-unit full-coverage restoration on very important abutment enamel. They recognized a major enchancment in sufferers to whom IDS was utilized at 1 week and 1 month after cementation, whereas no variations between IDS and DDS teams had been discovered on the finish of 6, 12 and 24 months. Conversely, van der Breemer102 detected no distinction amongst IDS and DDS, an anticipated end result given the minimally invasive design used for partial ceramic restorations of their examine. Therefore, the quantity of tooth tissue eliminated performs an necessary half within the diploma of postoperative sensitivity.104 A distance of 0.5 mm from the pulp could cause a pulpal response in 60% of instances, whereas an analogous state of affairs happens in 5% of enamel wherein >1 mm of dentin has been preserved.105
Early sealing of dentin tubules supplied by the IDS approach appears to scale back sensitivity in the course of the provisional section and after cementation. It is a promising technique for enhancing consolation and therapy satisfaction.
Dialogue
Systematic evaluations displaying a major distinction by way of longevity between direct and oblique composite restorations are missing.106,107 However, oblique composite restorations are really useful within the case of endodontically handled enamel.108 Such restorations additionally overcome the issues associated to polymerization shrinkage or insufficient curing, thereby offering higher mechanical properties, occlusal morphology, and proximal contacts.2,109 Though these restorations represent a big workload in on a regular basis apply, clear protocols relating to the dealing with of ready tissues and supplies used to acquire optimum outcomes are missing. We reviewed the literature to offer clinically oriented solutions to questions relating to essential procedures associated to every step of oblique restorations, from the preparation appointment till restoration supply and upkeep.
Some kinds of oblique restorations work together solely with enamel,110 whereas others demand extra aggressive preparation that inevitably results in dentin publicity.111 Data of the anatomic and morphologic variations between these two tissues is prime to deal with them appropriately. Enamel is principally manufactured from the mineral hydroxyapatite (which is crystalline calcium phosphate) and it comprises just about no water.112 Dentin has a better proportion of natural matter and is perforated by dentinal tubules that comprise odontoblasts and transmit thermal stimuli, stress, and ache.113 Pulp and dentin are embryologically, histologically, and functionally equivalent tissue; this results in the assumption that they shouldn’t be studied as separate tissues however should be seen as a pulp–dentin advanced.114 Consequently, leaving dentin uncovered is akin to an “open pathway” in direction of the pulp, which endangers tooth vitality as a result of microorganisms can attain the pulp tissue if it’s not sealed adequately.102 This assumption is supported by the findings of Sailer et al,115 who discovered that lack of vitality of an abutment tooth was probably the most frequent biologic complication for metallic–ceramic crowns. This discovering helps the usage of a method that seals dentin hermetically.
One may declare that utility of an adhesive on the preparation appointment would diminish its bonding capability on the closing cementation appointment. Nonetheless, research have proven that enamel on which DDS is carried out show inferior bond power,31,67,68,82,86,116–118 whereas IDS favors delayed restoration placement19 and gives bond power and cuspal deflection just like that noticed in direct composite-restored enamel.9,69,119,120 Direct restorations yield larger bond power as compared with that utilizing oblique restorations,121 so methods resembling IDS that improve the bonding capability of oblique procedures must be adopted. Furthermore, IDS doesn’t enhance the variety of scientific appointments however is included within the mandatory steps of an oblique restoration.
A facet that must be clarified is the mechanism that defines composite-to-composite bond. Though one may assume that chemical bonding of free radicals is the primary issue that determines the next bond,122 different mechanisms play a extra essential position. Focus of free radicals declines as the fabric ages and in line with Anzlovar et al54 they play a minor position inside 24 hours and they’re utterly eradicated after 2.5 days. Mechanisms resembling micromechanical interlocking and interpretating community matrices (IPN) appear to play a serious position.91,123,124 For the latter to be shaped, monomers of the resin cement are subtle into the composite resin and polymerized, and it’s the depth of this penetration that determines bond power.91,124,125 Components such because the elevated polarity of the floor resulting from contact with water reduces the diffusion potential and because of this implementation of strategies that take away a number of microns of the composite layer must be utilized.54
The literature recommends a number of coatings of a DBA and extra utility of an LVR within the case of an unfilled adhesive system.57–59 Therefore, one other problem that requires additional clarification is the impression of the thickness of the DBA movie on acceptable seating and marginal adaptation of the restoration. The above-mentioned thickness varies relying on the topography of the tooth preparation,56,57 however it’s captured with impression-taking and, due to this fact, the match of the ultimate restoration isn’t influenced.11 Addition of those coatings may elevate issues relating to totally different materials interfaces. Nonetheless, composite resins have a modulus of elasticity that’s near that of dental tissues,126 thereby eliminating the chance of nonuniform stress distribution if there’s a huge distinction between restorative supplies.127 If a composite restoration as a substitute of a ceramic restoration is chosen, this threat is diminished additional.
One other concern relating to IDS pertains to interplay with impression supplies. Nonetheless, this matter will in all probability not concern future generations as a result of intraoral scanning applied sciences have yielded outcomes which are equal (and even superior) to these of typical impression methods.128 Presently, this expertise is indicated in short-span restorations and represents a problem relating to edentulous arches.129
Full elimination of the provisional materials is troublesome. Therefore, penetration of the adhesive monomers into dentin may show to be insufficient.44 Occlusion of dentin tubules with interim supplies has been recognized, as has a subsequent response of zinc-oxide remnants with the acidic primer of some adhesive programs.130 Due to this fact, the early sealing of dentin tubules with a DBA may forestall their obstruction by interim residues, in addition to the inhibition of adhesion-system polymerization resulting from eugenol diffusion from interim materials into dentin.43 Removing of the provisional restoration endangers the integrity of tooth preparation, so it must be carried out with warning.35 Methods that pursue spot bonding of the provisional materials should evolve and be carried out for an optimum end result. However, novel digital expertise/protocols are likely to get rid of the necessity for provisional restorations. Silva et al131 proposed a method wherein digital design and three-dimensional-printed guides present the chance for cementing restorations instantly after preparation completion.
IDS is a substantiated approach primarily in line with many in vitro research. Among the many 88 research included on this assessment, 64 are vitro research and solely 12 are scientific surveys. Extra scientific trials, ideally randomized ones (that are thought-about the “gold normal” for analysis of interventions132) are wanted to additional assist the efficacy of this system and make clear sure features relating to it. Furthermore, implementation of novel supplies and methods must be examined. A way has been described the place a fiber community has been included within the IDS.70,133 The rationale behind this alternative is that in case of a vertical crack, its propagation could also be stopped by the fiber community. Fibers and their incorporation in dental restorations are a promising area and their use is rising in instances that demand cusp alternative to boost the efficiency of typical restorative composite resins by way of fracture resistance.134,135
Conclusions
The IDS approach appears to be advantageous with regard to bond power, hole formation, bacterial microleakage, and dentin hypersensitivity. Nonetheless, points arising from interplay with impression supplies, the provisional section, and conditioning strategies earlier than cementation require additional investigation. There aren’t any documented causes stopping clinicians making use of IDS of their on a regular basis apply.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of curiosity on this work.
References
1. Barone A, Derchi G, Rossi A, Marconcini S, Covani U. Longitudinal scientific analysis of bonded composite inlays: a 3-12 months Research. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2008;39(1):65–71.
2. Duquia Rde C, Osinaga PW, Demarco FF, Conceicao EN. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: in vitro comparability of oblique and direct composite. Oper Dent. 2006;31(6):682–687. doi:10.2341/05-132
3. Duarte S
4. Jud C, Schaff F, Zanette I, Wolf J, Fehringer A, Pfeiffer F. Dentinal tubules revealed with X-ray tensor tomography. Dent Mater. 2016;32(9):1189–1195. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.021
5. Sahin C, Cehreli ZC, Yenigul M, Dayangac B. In vitro permeability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives used for quick dentin sealing. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(3):401–408. doi:10.4012/dmj.2011-217
6. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent. 1992;17(1):13–20.
7. Helvey GA. Adhesive dentistry: the event of quick dentin sealing/selective etching bonding approach. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011;32(9):
8. Ashy LM, Marghalani H, Silikas N. In vitro analysis of marginal and inner variations of ceramic inlay restorations related to quick vs delayed dentin sealing methods. Int J Prosthodont. 2020;33(1):48–55. doi:10.11607/ijp.6372
9. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Quick dentin sealing improves bond power of oblique restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(6):511–519. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010
10. Leite M, Lopes LG, de Souza D, Carvalho M. Quick dentin sealing with self-etch dentin bonding agent for oblique restoration. World J Dent. 2017;8(6):490–495. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1492
11. Magne P. Quick dentin sealing: a basic process for oblique bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(3):144–154; dialogue 155. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x
12. Paul SJ, Scharer P. The twin bonding approach: a modified methodology to enhance adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997;17(6):536–545.
13. Paul SJ, Scharer P. Impact of provisional cements on the bond power of varied adhesive bonding programs on dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24(1):8–14. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00484.x
14. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Bonded to tooth ceramic restorations: in vitro analysis of the effectivity and failure mode of two trendy adhesives. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1995;105(3):299–305.
15. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic restoration of the crown. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12(2):111–121.
16. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro analysis of marginal and inner adaptation of sophistication II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(6):1033–1042. doi:10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x
17. Nikaido T, Tagami J, Yatani H, et al. Idea and scientific utility of the resin-coating approach for oblique restorations. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(2):192–196. doi:10.4012/dmj.2017-253
18. Magne P. IDS: Quick Dentin Sealing (IDS) for tooth preparations. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(6):594. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a33324
19. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Quick dentin sealing helps delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(3):166–174. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60052-3
20. Nawareg MM, Zidan AZ, Zhou J, Chiba A, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Adhesive sealing of dentin surfaces in vitro: a assessment. Am J Dent. 2015;28(6):321–332.
21. Ferreira-Filho RC, Ely C, Amaral RC, et al. Impact of various adhesive programs used for quick dentin sealing on bond power of a self-adhesive resin cement to dentin. Oper Dent. 2018;43(4):391–397. doi:10.2341/17-023-L
22. Chersoni S, Suppa P, Grandini S, et al. In vivo and in vitro permeability of one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2004;83(6):459–464. doi:10.1177/154405910408300605
23. Sauro S, Pashley DH, Montanari M, et al. Impact of simulated pulpal stress on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2007;23(6):705–713. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.010
24. Gregoire G, Joniot S, Guignes P, Millas A. Dentin permeability: self-etching and one-bottle dentin bonding programs. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(1):42–49. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00258-0
25. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The impact of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/stuffed composite system. J Dent Res. 1990;69(10):1652–1658. doi:10.1177/00220345900690100501
26. Erickson RL. Mechanism and scientific implications of bond formation for 2 dentin bonding brokers. Am J Dent. 1989;2:117–123.
27. Magne P, Nielsen B. Interactions between impression supplies and quick dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(5):298–305. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60178-5
28. Ghiggi PC, Steiger AK, Marcondes ML, Mota EG, Burnett LHJ, Spohr AM. Does quick dentin sealing affect the polymerization of impression supplies? Eur J Dent. 2014;8(3):366–372. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.137650
29. Khakiani MI, Kumar V, Pandya HV, Nathani TI, Verma P, Bhanushali NV. Impact of quick dentin sealing on polymerization of elastomeric supplies: an ex vivo randomized managed trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12(4):288–292. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1657
30. Bruzi G, Carvalho MA, Maia HP, Giannini M, Magne P. Are there mixtures of resin liners and impression supplies not appropriate with IDS approach? Am J Esthet Dent. 2013;3(3):200–208.
31. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira P, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(2):105–113; dialogue 113. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00325.x
32. Udo T, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, et al. Enhancement of adhesion between resin coating supplies and resin cements. Dent Mater J. 2007;26(4):519–525. doi:10.4012/dmj.26.519
33. Sinjari B, D’Addazio G, Murmura G, et al. Avoidance of interplay between impression supplies and tooth floor handled for quick dentin sealing: an in vitro examine. Supplies (Basel). 2019;12(20):3454. doi:10.3390/ma12203454
34. da Silva CJR, Gonçalves ICS, Botelho MPJ, Guiraldo RD, Lopes MB, Ja G. Interactions between resin‑primarily based non permanent supplies and quick dentin sealing. Appl Adhes Sci. 2016;4(3).
35. Schoenbaum TR, Ercus S, Snowden J. Reverse spot bonding: a novel approach for provisionalization with quick dentin sealing. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;33(5):374–377.
36. Takimoto M, Ishii R, Iino M, et al. Affect of non permanent cement contamination on the floor free vitality and dentine bond power of self-adhesive cements. J Dent. 2012;40(2):131–138. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2011.11.012
37. Watanabe EK, Yatani H, Ishikawa Okay, Suzuki Okay, Yamashita A. Pilot examine of conditioner/primer results on resin-dentin bonding after provisional cement contamination utilizing SEM, vitality dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, and bond power analysis measures. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(3):349–355. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70139-9
38. Ribeiro JC, Coelho PG, Janal MN, Silva NR, Monteiro AJ, Fernandes CA. The affect of non permanent cements on dental adhesive programs for luting cementation. J Dent. 2011;39(3):255–262. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.004
39. Hironaka NGL, Ubaldini ALM, Sato F, Giannini M, Terada RSS, Pascotto RC. Affect of quick dentin sealing and interim cementation on the adhesion of oblique restorations with dual-polymerizing resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):678e1–678 e8. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.001
40. Yap AU, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC. Affect of eugenol-containing non permanent restorations on bond power of composite to dentin. Oper Dent. 2001;26(6):556–561.
41. Bayindir F, Akyil MS, Bayindir YZ. Impact of eugenol and non-eugenol containing non permanent cement on everlasting cement retention and microhardness of cured composite resin. Dent Mater J. 2003;22(4):592–599. doi:10.4012/dmj.22.592
42. Leirskar J, Nordbo H. The impact of zinc oxide-eugenol on the shear bond power of a generally used bonding system. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000;16(6):265–268. doi:10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016006265.x
43. Erkut S, Kucukesmen HC, Eminkahyagil N, Imirzalioglu P, Karabulut E. Affect of earlier provisional cementation on the bond power between two definitive resin-based luting and dentin bonding brokers and human dentin. Oper Dent. 2007;32(1):84–93. doi:10.2341/06-27
44. Brigagao VC, Barreto LFD, Goncalves KAS, et al. Impact of interim cement utility on bond power between resin cements and dentin: quick and delayed dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(6):792–798. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.015
45. Sailer I, Oendra AE, Stawarczyk B, Hammerle CH. The consequences of desensitizing resin, resin sealing, and provisional cement on the bond power of dentin luted with self-adhesive and standard resincements. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107(4):252–260. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60070-5
46. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Taschner M, Petschelt A, Nikolaenko SA. Adhesive luting revisited: affect of adhesive, non permanent cement, cavity cleansing, and curing mode on inner dentin bond power. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(Suppl 2):269–273.
47. Augusti D, Re D, Özcan M. Removing of non permanent cements following an instantaneous dentin hybridization method: a comparability of mechanical and chemical strategies for substrate cleansing. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018;32(7):693–704. doi:10.1080/01694243.2017.1381015
48. Dillenburg AL, Soares CG, Paranhos MP, Spohr AM, Loguercio AD, Burnett LH
49. Falkensammer F, Arnetzl GV, Wildburger A, Krall C, Freudenthaler J. Affect of various conditioning strategies on quick and delayed dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(2):204–210. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.028
50. van den Breemer C, Ozcan M, Cune MS, Ayres AA, Van Meerbeek B, Gresnigt M. Impact of quick dentin sealing and floor conditioning on the microtensile bond power of resin-based composite to dentin. Oper Dent. 2019;44(6):E289–E298. doi:10.2341/18-052-L
51. van den Breemer CR, Ozcan M, Pols MR, Postema AR, Cune MS, Gresnigt MM. Adhesion of resin cement to dentin: results of adhesive promoters, quick dentin sealing methods, and floor conditioning. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(1):52–63.
52. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Impact of floor conditioning strategies on the microtensile bond power of resin composite to composite after getting old circumstances. Dent Mater. 2007;23(10):1276–1282. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007
53. Rodrigues SA
54. Anžlovar A, Kiteska B, Cevc P, Kopač I. The position of an interfacial interpenetrating polymer community formation on the adhesion of resin composite layers in quick dentin sealing. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;90:9–14. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.01.009
55. Özcan M. Impact of mechanical and air-particle cleaning protocols of provisional cement on quick dentin sealing layer and subsequent adhesion of resin composite cement. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2015;29(24):2731–2743. doi:10.1080/01694243.2015.1087254
56. Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, Magne P. Quick dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured dentin bonding agent and impact of floor cleansing. Oper Dent. 2005;30(6):747–757.
57. Spohr AM, Borges GA, Platt JA. Thickness of quick dentin sealing supplies and its impact on the fracture load of a bolstered all-ceramic crown. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(4):474–483. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.120682
58. Hashimoto M, Sano H, Yoshida E, et al. Results of a number of adhesive coatings on dentin bonding. Oper Dent. 2004;29(4):416–423.
59. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, et al. Results of a number of coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(2):133–141.
60. Murata T, Maseki T, Nara Y. Impact of quick dentin sealing purposes on bonding of CAD/CAM ceramic onlay restoration. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(6):928–939. doi:10.4012/dmj.2017-377
61. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The consequences of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res. 2000;79(3):812–817. doi:10.1177/00220345000790030501
62. D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Prosperi GD, et al. The affect of adhesive thickness on the microtensile bond power of three adhesive programs. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(2):109–115.
63. Figueiredo Reis A, Giannini M, Ambrosano GM, Chan DC. The consequences of filling methods and a low-viscosity composite liner on bond power to class II cavities. J Dent. 2003;31(1):59–66. doi:10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00122-7
64. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability impacts coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent. 2004;32(1):55–65. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.003
65. Duarte RM, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Impact of time on tensile bond power of resin cement bonded to dentine and low-viscosity composite. J Dent. 2006;34(1):52–61. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.002
66. Santos-Daroz CB, Oliveira MT, Goes MF, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Giannini M. Bond power of a resin cement to dentin utilizing the resin coating approach. Braz Oral Res. 2008;22(3):198–204. doi:10.1590/s1806-83242008000300002
67. Okuda M, Nikaido T, Maruoka R, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity flooring dentin in oblique composite restorations utilizing resin coating. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(1):38–46; dialogue 47–8. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00062.x
68. Ariyoshi M, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strengths of composite cores to pulpal flooring dentin with resin coating. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(3):400–407. doi:10.4012/dmj.27.400
69. Akehashi S, Takahashi R, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Enhancement of dentin bond power of resin cement utilizing new resin coating supplies. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(6):955–962. doi:10.4012/dmj.2018-328
70. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Hehn J, Oderich E, Boff LL. Selective masking for skinny oblique restorations: can the usage of opaque resin have an effect on the dentine bond power of instantly sealed preparations? J Dent. 2011;39(10):707–709. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.005
71. Johnson GH, Hazelton LR, Bales DJ, Lepe X. The impact of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for 3 kinds of cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(5):428–435. doi:10.1016/S0022391304000770
72. Patel P, Thummar M, Shah D, Pitti V. Evaluating the impact of a resin primarily based sealer on crown retention for 3 kinds of cements: an in vitro examine. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13(3):308–314. doi:10.1007/s13191-013-0269-3
73. Dalby R, Ellakwa A, Millar B, Martin FE. Affect of quick dentin sealing on the shear bond power of pressed ceramic luted to dentin with self-etch resin cement. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:310702. doi:10.1155/2012/310702
74. Giannini M, Takagaki T, Bacelar-Sa R, et al. Affect of resin coating on bond power of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(6):822–827. doi:10.4012/dmj.2015-099
75. Santana VB, de Alexandre RS, Rodrigues JA, Ely C, Reis AF. Results of quick dentin sealing and pulpal stress on resin cement bond power and nanoleakage. Oper Dent. 2016;41(2):189–199. doi:10.2341/15-150-L
76. Van den Breemer CRG, Buijs GJ, Cune MS, et al. Potential scientific analysis of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted utilizing photo-polymerized resin composite along side quick dentin sealing. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(3):1463–1473. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03454-7
77. Yazigi C, Kern M, Chaar MS. Affect of varied bonding methods on the fracture power of skinny CAD/CAM-fabricated occlusal glass-ceramic veneers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;75:504–511. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.016
78. Ishii N, Maseki T, Nara Y. Bonding state of metal-free CAD/CAM onlay restoration after cyclic loading with and with out quick dentin sealing. Dent Mater J. 2017;36(3):357–367. doi:10.4012/dmj.2016-289
79. van den Breemer CRG, Ozcan M, Cune MS, van der Giezen R, Kerdijk W, Gresnigt MMM. Impact of quick dentine sealing on the fracture power of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite inlay restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;72:102–109. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.04.002
80. Rigos AE, Dandoulaki C, Kontonasaki E, Kokoti M, Papadopoulou L, Koidis P. Impact of quick dentin sealing on the bond power of monolithic zirconia to human dentin. Oper Dent. 2019;44(4):E167–E179. doi:10.2341/18-198-L
81. Reboul T, Hoang Thai HA, Cetik S, Atash R. Comparability between shear forces utilized on the overlay-dental tissue interface utilizing totally different bonding methods: an in vitro examine. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018;18(3):212–218. doi:10.4103/jips.jips_165_17
82. van den Breemer CR, Gresnigt MM, Cune MS. Cementation of glass-ceramic posterior restorations: a scientific assessment. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:148954. doi:10.1155/2015/148954
83. El-Damanhoury HM, Gaintantzopoulou M. The impact of quick dentin sealing and optical powder elimination methodology on the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated endocrowns. Int J Comput Dent. 2016;19(2):135–151.
84. Belleflamme MM, Geerts SO, Louwette MM, Grenade CF, Vanheusden AJ, Mainjot AK. No post-no core method to revive severely broken posterior enamel: an as much as 10-year retrospective examine of documented endocrown instances. J Dent. 2017;63:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.009
85. Burke FJ. Survival charges for porcelain laminate veneers with particular reference to the impact of preparation in dentin: a literature assessment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(4):257–265. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2012.00517.x
86. Gresnigt MM, Cune MS, de Roos JG, Ozcan M. Impact of quick and delayed dentin sealing on the fracture power, failure kind and Weilbull traits of lithiumdisilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater. 2016;32(4):e73–81. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.001
87. Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, Schuitemaker J, et al. Efficiency of ceramic laminate veneers with quick dentine sealing: an 11 yr potential scientific trial. Dent Mater. 2019;35(7):1042–1052. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.008
88. Hofsteenge JW, Hogeveen F, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM. Impact of quick dentine sealing on the getting old and fracture power of lithium disilicate inlays and overlays. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;110:103906. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103906
89. Leesungbok R, Lee SM, Park SJ, et al. The impact of IDS (quick dentin sealing) on dentin bond power beneath varied thermocycling durations. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7(3):224–232. doi:10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.224
90. Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(5):316–323. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00060.x
91. Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, et al. Composite-to composite microtensile bond power within the restore of a microfilled hybrid resin: impact of floor therapy and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(1):25–31.
92. Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The match of metal-ceramic crowns, a Scientific Research. Dent Mater. 1985;1(5):197–199. doi:10.1016/s0109-5641(85)80019-1
93. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement movie thickness by an in vivo approach. Br Dent J. 1971;131(3):107–111. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
94. Grajower R, Zuberi Y, Lewinstein I. Enhancing the match of crowns with die spacers. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(5):555–563. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(89)90275-8
95. Kitayama S, Nasser NA, Pilecki P, et al. Impact of resin coating and occlusal loading on microleakage of sophistication II computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated ceramic restorations: a Confocal Microscopic Research. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011;69(3):182–192. doi:10.3109/00016357.2010.549504
96. Maruoka R, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Ishizuka T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Coronal leakage inhibition in endodontically handled enamel utilizing resin-coating approach. Dent Mater J. 2006;25(1):97–103. doi:10.4012/dmj.25.97
97. Schenke F, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Federlin M. Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns inside dentin with totally different luting methods and supplies. Oper Dent. 2008;33(5):516–525. doi:10.2341/07-131
98. de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond power of composite oblique restorations bonded to dentin handled with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. Dent Mater. 2007;23(3):279–287. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.028
99. Medina AD, de Paula AB, de Fucio SBP, Puppin-Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho LC, Sinhoreti MAC. Marginal adaptation of oblique restorations utilizing totally different resin coating protocols. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(6):672–678. doi:10.1590/S0103-64402012000600008
100. Medina ADC, de Paula AB, Naufel FS, Puppin-rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Nanoleakage in oblique composite restorations utilizing totally different mixtures of resin coating approach. Appl Adhes Sci. 2014;2(5):5. doi:10.1186/2196-4351-2-5
101. De Rose L, Krejci I, Bortolotto T. Quick endodontic entry cavity sealing: fundamentals of a brand new restorative approach. Odontology. 2015;103(3):280–285. doi:10.1007/s10266-014-0174-1
102. van den Breemer C, Gresnigt M, Ozcan M, Kerdijk W, Cune MS. Potential randomized scientific trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial crowns bonded utilizing quick or delayed dentin sealing: short-term outcomes on tooth sensitivity and affected person satisfaction. Oper Dent. 2019;44(5):E212–E222. doi:10.2341/18-047-C
103. Hu J, Zhu Q. Impact of quick dentin sealing on preventive therapy for postcementation hypersensitivity. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(1):49–52.
104. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth construction elimination related to varied preparation designs for posterior enamel. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22(3):241–249.
105. Camps J, Dejou J, Remusat M, About I. Components influencing pulpal response to cavity restorations. Dent Mater. 2000;16(6):432–440. doi:10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00041-5
106. Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, Kloukos D. Direct versus oblique inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior enamel. A scientific assessment and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;53:12–21. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.011
107. da Veiga AM, Cunha AC, Ferreira DM, et al. Longevity of direct and oblique resin composite restorations in everlasting posterior enamel: a scientific assessment and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;54:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.003
108. Shu X, Mai QQ, Blatz M, Value R, Wang XD, Zhao Okay. Direct and oblique restorations for endodontically handled enamel: a scientific assessment and meta-analysis, IAAD 2017 consensus convention paper. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(3):183–194. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a40762
109. Wassell RW, Partitions AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus typical composite restorations: three-year scientific outcomes. Br Dent J. 1995;179(9):343–349. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4808919
110. Nattress BR, Youngson CC, Patterson CJ, Martin DM, Ralph JP. An in vitro evaluation of tooth preparation for porcelain veneer restorations. J Dent. 1995;23(3):165–170. doi:10.1016/0300-5712(95)93574-l
111. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for full crowns: an artwork type primarily based on scientific rules. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(4):363–376. doi:10.1067/mpr.2001.114685
112. Chai H. On the mechanical properties of tooth enamel beneath spherical indentation. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(11):4852–4860. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.003
113. Arana-Chavez VE, Massa LF. Odontoblasts: the cells forming and sustaining dentine. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36(8):1367–1373. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2004.01.006
114. Kawashima N, Okiji T. Odontoblasts: specialised hard-tissue-forming cells within the dentin-pulp advanced. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2016;56(4):144–153. doi:10.1111/cga.12169
115. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported mounted dental prostheses (FDPs)? A scientific assessment of the survival and complication charges. Half I: single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015;31(6):603–623. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011
116. Choi YS, Cho IH. An impact of quick dentin sealing on the shear bond power of resin cement to porcelain restoration. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010;2(2):39–45. doi:10.4047/jap.2010.2.2.39
117. Islam MR, Takada T, Weerasinghe DS, et al. Impact of resin coating on adhesion of composite crown restoration. Dent Mater J. 2006;25(2):272–279. doi:10.4012/dmj.25.272
118. Sag BU, Bektas OO. Impact of quick dentin sealing, bonding approach, and restorative materials on the bond power of oblique restorations. Braz Dent Sci. 2020;23(2). doi:10.14295/bds.2020.v23i2.1923
119. Oliveira L, Mota EG, Borges GA, Burnett LH
120. Shafiei F, Aghaei T, Jowkar Z. Impact of proanthocyanidin mediated quick and delayed dentin sealing on the power of premolars restored with composite resin inlay. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(3):e235–e241. doi:10.4317/jced.55942
121. Zorba YO, Ilday NO, Bayindir YZ, Demirbuga S. Evaluating the shear bond power of direct and oblique composite inlays in relation to totally different floor conditioning and curing methods. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(4):436–441. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.120679
122. Özcan M. Impact ofdelayinlayeringontheincrementaladhesionofindirectdental composite resins. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2012;39:15–20.
123. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements – chemistry, properties and scientific issues. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):295–314. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x
124. Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond power within the restore of a microfilled hybrid resin: impact of floor therapy and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8(6).
125. Vallittu PK. Interpenetrating Polymer Networks (IPNs) in dental polymers and composites. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2009;23(7–8):961–972. doi:10.1163/156856109X432785
126. Benetti AR, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A, Flury S. Resin composites: modulus of elasticity and marginal high quality. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1185–1192. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.004
127. Afroz S, Tripathi A, Chand P, Shanker R. Stress sample generated by totally different publish and core materials mixtures: a Photoelastic Research. Indian J Dent Res. 2013;24(1):93–97. doi:10.4103/0970-9290.114959
128. Tomita Y, Uechi J, Konno M, Sasamoto S, Iijima M, Mizoguchi I. Accuracy of digital fashions generated by typical impression/plaster-model strategies and intraoral scanning. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(4):628–633. doi:10.4012/dmj.2017-208
129. Bohner L, Gamba DD, Hanisch M, et al. Accuracy of digital applied sciences for the scanning of facial, skeletal, and intraoral tissues: a scientific assessment. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):246–251. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.015
130. Watanabe EK, Yamashita A, Imai M, Yatani H, Suzuki Okay. Short-term cement remnants as an adhesion inhibiting issue within the interface between resin cements and bovine dentin. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10(5):440–452.
131. Silva BPD, Stanley Okay, Gardee J. Laminate veneers: preplanning and therapy utilizing digital guided tooth preparation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):150–160. doi:10.1111/jerd.12571
132. Sargeant JM, Kelton DF, O’Connor AM. Research designs and systematic evaluations of interventions: constructing proof throughout examine designs. Zoonoses Public Well being. 2014;61(Suppl 1):10–17. doi:10.1111/zph.12127
133. Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. Fiber-reinforced resin coating for endocrown preparations: a technical report. Oper Dent. 2013;38(3):242–248. doi:10.2341/12-139-TR
134. Fennis WM, Tezvergil A, Kuijs RH, et al. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber bolstered cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21(6):565–572. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.019
135. Bijelic-Donova J, Keulemans F, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Direct bilayered biomimetic composite restoration: the impact of a cusp-supporting quick fiber-reinforced base design on the chewing fracture resistance and failure mode of molars with or with out endodontic therapy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;103:103554. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103554
136. Nikaido T, Nakaoki Y, Ogata M, Foxton R, Tagami J. The resin-coating approach. Impact of a single-step bonding system on dentin bond strengths. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(4):293–300.
137. Terry AD, Powers JM, Paul SJ. Quick dentin sealing approach. Dent As we speak. 2009;28(9):140–141.
138. Lee JI, Park SH. The impact of three variables on shear bond power when luting a resin inlay to dentin. Oper Dent. 2009;34(3):288–292. doi:10.2341/08-82
139. Magne P, Boff LL, Oderich E, Cardoso AC. Pc-aided-design/computer-assisted-manufactured adhesive restoration of molars with a compromised cusp: impact of fiber-reinforced quick dentin sealing and cusp overlap on fatigue power. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(2):135–146. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00433.x
140. Perugia C, Ferraro E, Docimo R. Quick dentin sealing in oblique restorations of dental fractures in paediatric dentistry. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(2):146–149.
141. Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Proof-based ideas and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Half II. Pointers for cavity preparation and restoration fabrication. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015;10(3):392–413.
142. Nikaido T, Inoue G, Takagaki T, Takahashi R, Sadr A, Tagami J. Resin coating approach for defense of pulp and rising bonding in oblique restoration. Curr Oral Well being Rep. 2015;2(2):81–86. doi:10.1007/s40496-015-0046-y
143. Goldberg J, Guth JF, Magne P. Accelerated fatigue resistance of thick CAD/CAM composite resin overlays bonded with light- and dual-polymerizing luting resins. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):341–348. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a36515
144. Qanungo A, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mysore A, Amin B, Daswani SR. Quick dentin sealing for oblique bonded restorations. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(4):240–249. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2016.04.001
145. Lima MF, Maciel CM, Correia AMO, Griza S, Mendonça AAMD. Impact of non permanent cements on the bond power of a resin cement to a pre-hybridized dentin. Bioscience J. 2017;33(1):247–256. doi:10.14393/BJ-v33n1a2017-34668
146. Fouda HOT. Put up-Operative Hyper-Sensitivity Evaluation After Quick versus Delayed Dentine Sealing in Oblique Tooth Coloured Restorations: Randomized Managed Scientific Trial. Cairo College; 2019.
147. Hayashi Okay, Maeno M, Nara Y. Affect of quick dentin sealing and non permanent restoration on the bonding of CAD/CAM ceramic crown restoration. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(6):970–980. doi:10.4012/dmj.2018-313
148. van den Breemer CRG, Cune MS, Ozcan M, Naves LZ, Kerdijk W, Gresnigt MMM. Randomized scientific trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial restorations bonded utilizing quick or delayed dentin sealing after 3 years of perform. J Dent. 2019;85:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.02.001
149. Rozan S, Takahashi R, Nikaido T, Tichy A, Tagami J. CAD/CAM-fabricated inlay restorations: can the resin-coating approach enhance bond power and inner adaptation? Dent Mater J. 2020;39(6):941–949. doi:10.4012/dmj.2019-309
150. Cesca R, Colombo V, Ernst B, Gallo LM, Ozcan M. Tensile power and failure kinds of direct and oblique resin composite copings for perio-overdentures luted utilizing totally different adhesive cementation modalities. Supplies (Basel). 2020;13(16):3517. doi:10.3390/ma13163517
